Route 29: mods (
these_balls) wrote in
route_0062013-10-16 10:21 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
HMD | October 2013
EVALUATE MY BATTLING!
Trainer Tip: play nice and keep it civil.
things to keep in mind:
→ This is encouraged, not mandatory. We will not penalize you for not using it.
→ Feel free to link your personal HMDs if you would like, just in case someone doesn't want to use the mass HMD post.
→ this is more for actual critique and discussion. Please don't just blindly praise a person or just call them horrible. If someone's doing a wonderful job, you can tell them, just tell them why, or even where they're showing off bonus perks. If someone's doing a not-so-wonderful job, tell them why, give them things to improve on if you can. Examples, links, things that can give them something to work on. Meaning, no bashing, flaming, or nasty behavior. Please keep it civil.
→ Anonymous is turned on! But note: anonymous is a privilege, not a right. If it's being abused to bash players, please be sure to let one of us know and we'll step in or freeze threads if necessary. If anonymous is abused too much, it will be turned off for the next HMD.
→ Don't take this all too personally! Remember that roleplay is a game, and crit is supposed to help, not make you feel horribly. No one is perfect, we've all got room to improve. Please keep that in mind.
→ MOD/GAME HMD
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-17 01:04 pm (UTC)(link)I think you would also benefit from actually paying attention to how the people you play with format things. Not that you need to copy people exactly or do everything just like a certain person or certain people, but the way you format things is really hard to read. For example, in your tags there are very few line breaks and paragraphs tend to run together, making it hard to discern where one thought ends and another begins. I get that that might be part of the character, but it makes longer tags a headache and a half to read. Try breaking it up more, and put clean paragraph breaks instead of just single-spacing it. LONG BLOCKS OF CAPSLOCK EMPHASIS is also not necessary, at least not to the extent that you use it.
This last point may need to be taken with a grain of salt because it's been a while since I've seen the show, but I don't remember Crocker being nearly so self-pitying or prone to making obvious ploys for sympathy. Is there a reason he's been doing that in Route that I've missed?
no subject
Mmmm, maybe I could say exclaims in brackets or something. His speech dialogue is rather odd since if you listen to the man speak, he can start out in a normal tone, start mumble talking out loud to himself or some variation of that (in a sentence!) and just normal text like this doesn't quite work to have him come off as insane.
Though I am sorry about the headache, anon. I'll try using the brackets to explain how his tone is changing.
He monologues about self pity/bitterness, not that other characters in the show listen to that.
da
(Anonymous) 2013-10-18 02:20 pm (UTC)(link)You've got his craziness down very well. I actually like the different sizes of text that you use to denote how unhinged he is. But I have to admit that I'm unsure about how to tag Crocker because he's a lot more angsty than I remember. I know he had crap circumstances but Fairly Oddparents is a children's cartoon. None of that is discussed very seriously in the show and by constantly focusing on it as one of Crocker's defining traits I think you're making him less funny and less, for lack of a better word, "cartoony". So he feels less like the cartoon character he is in the show and more of an OC that's based somewhat on the character but placed in the real world with real-life consequences. I think you'd benefit if you stopped playing him as a real person and remember that at the end of the day Crocker's past isn't meant to be taken as seriously as it should be in real life.
Re: da
Believe me, Timmy mun, would kick my virtual (they know FOP almost as well as I do) and would complain to me if something was wrong.
As far as the text quirk goes, if you tell me what characters you play, I'll make a note to try a different when tagging your characters.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-10-18 03:33 pm (UTC)(link)I'm all for the comfort of the majority. I can live with or without the text size differences. But thank you anyway for making an effort.
no subject
Really, you see cute kid Crocker transform into his ugly kid self and what the man will look like as an adult.You’re welcome! <3
no subject
Also, please refrain from being rude to those who are offering critiques. They're giving their opinions because they wish to help you grow as a player, and having a dismissive or rude attitude isn't appreciated.
no subject
But it doesn't change the fact that older Nick cartoons have a darker edge, and FOP is paricualar darker edged with Crocker as you see the sweet boy transform into a monster, in Secret Origin of Denzel Crocker, or when Crocker is also seen in the asylum in Abra Catastrophe, both in a non comedic event and once again there is a nightmare plot going on.
no subject
I know 90s cartoons had a more grimdark edge to some, which can be interpreted or explored against in RP. We have opened it up to grim situations, and we have many characters from 90s cartoons who have explored a darker setting. However, not every grimdark situation is the same and not every character reacts similarly. Sometimes people have differing opinions. And when faced by a differing opinion, you do not just argue it down dismissively because it's not from a castmate.
That coupled with the attitude are the reasons I stepped in. I don't mind if you want to debate your argument with the anon you were speaking with to explain the characterization, but take note of this:
You don't need to be rude and you don't need to just dismiss it because it isn't coming from Timmy's player.
I'm not going to argue for or against your point with 90s cartoons. I'm speaking only in regards to your conduct.
no subject